News flash: (Japanese) Monthly Shonen Jump to fold

ComiPress has the details: basically, low circulation did it in. Take that in context: “low circulation” is defined as 420,000 (well, that’s how many copies were printed), versus 1.4 million when it was at its peak in 1989. Licensed titles that come from Monthly SJ include Claymore and Beet the Vandel Buster. Publisher Shueisha says they will replace it with another magazine:

“We plan on creating a new magazine that is more in tune with the times, tentatively slated for a launch this fall.”

As always, Simon (NSFW) Jones puts things into perspective:

As an aside, I would personally strangle every single puppy in the world with my bare hands for a mid-six-figure circulation for anything we publish.

Check the comments for more.

About Brigid Alverson

Brigid Alverson has been reading comics since she was 4. After earning an MFA in printmaking, she headed to New York to become a famous artist but ended up working with words instead of pictures, first as a book editor and later as a newspaper reporter. She started MangaBlog to keep track of her daughters’ reading habits and now covers manga, comics and graphic novels as a freelancer for School Library Journal, Publishers Weekly Comics Week, Comic Book Resources, the Barnes & Noble Sci-Fi & Fantasy Blog, and Robot 6. She also edits the Good Comics for Kids blog at School Library Journal. Now settled in the outskirts of Boston, Brigid is married to a physicist and has two daughters.
This entry was posted in Mangablog. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to News flash: (Japanese) Monthly Shonen Jump to fold

  1. wontaek says:

    That is somewhat sad and unexpected news as Monthly Shonen Jump was where many interesting manga series got started

  2. Ninja337 says:

    I am very sad to hear that, as Shueisha’s monthly publication always really defined what great manga is to me. Hopefully the anticipated new magazine will not fold in the long standing tradition of quality that Shonen Jump had, and will maintain the status quo of awesome.

  3. Ninja337 says:

    Oh ya, and by status quo of awesome, I mean Beet the Vandel Buster, not Claymore.

Comments are closed.