Less steam, please

Time to cleanse the brain with a few other things.

At Yaoi 911, Alex asks if the world is ready for color manga. Because he’s doing one.

I am writing stories I’ve wanted to see my whole life. I am choosing to work with artists whose art rocks my world. And the book I’m going to publish is going to be big and it’s going to printed CMYK, because I’m dying to see the boys kissing in full, glorious COLOR.

But there are practical and philosophical issues. Be sure to read the comments for lots of good discussion.

Pata critiques the Toronto Star article that claimed that even nerds look down on anime and manga fans. After consulting the Geek Hierarchy Chart he concludes that the article, at the very least, grossly overstates the case. And anyway, he points out, we’re all getting older, and soon the new kids will be coming along with something we don’t even understand, and then we all die. Thanks for cheering us up, Pata!

Plenty of reviews up today, just in time for the weekend. Newsarama devotes more than a minute to three titles I like, Crimson Hero, Fool’s Gold, and Monster.

At Blogfonte, Mitch doesn’t like Drifting Classroom. He finds the art very stiff, a comment I’ve heard from others. And:

The panel design suggests that the impression is intentional – very rigid, confined, ruled, patterned. Except when something violent or disturbing happens, then the gutters disappear, the panels fill up the whole of the page, and blood & violence is lovingly, delicately inflicted upon Umezu’s doll-people, who suddenly come alive with fear, pain and horror.

On the other hand, here’s a gem from Matthew Alexander’s review of Aoi House:

My one complaint was the lack of nipples when this title has a 16+ rating. If the book is going to use cheesy steam covering only two or three small spots on naked females, then I think the 16+ rating may be a little high.

Got that? Less gore, more nipples. Sounds like a winning marketing plan to me.

Posted in Mangablog | 3 Comments

Tokyopop blogswarm

With the exception of PWCW’s lovefest with CEO Stu Levy, this has not been a good week for Tokyopop. And even that interview didn’t go over well with Dirk Deppey, who had some harsh words for Levy’s attempt to seem supportive of comics retailers in the interview while taking product off their shelves in real life. Deppey also points out, though, that while some retailers have been hollering (we’ll get to that in a minute), most comics stores don’t sell manga anyway. This is really more about the big chains.

ICv2 has responses to the online exclusives program from three different retailers, each of whom has a valid point. Ed Sherman doesn’t mind losing some books to online exclusives, but he resents them putting resources into pushing weak books when he can’t get copies of the hot sellers:

I cannot get copies of Kingdom Hearts #1-3, Loveless #1, or Battle Club #1, just to name a few. These are all strong selling books that have been out of stock for months. It also appears that it is becoming harder to re-order most new promising Tokyopop titles as well. As soon as a new title gets hot, we cannot get any restocks. What gives?

It almost looks like an ADV-type situation, only with existing releases rather than new ones: Fans want the product, but the publisher won’t sell it.

Robert Brown agrees with Ed and sees the latest move as evidence that Tokyopop is out of touch with its market. J. Carmody has a good suggestion for where this might go in the future:

Perhaps instead of removing titles from the trade channels to offer online as exclusives, an e-book version could be offered instead, with a better version (additional information, perhaps a backup story included) provided to the trade channel.

I like this because these “online exclusives,” while being touted as a positive thing, are clearly titles that Tokyopop has low expectations for. One way to spin this is, if they weren’t online exclusives, they wouldn’t be available at all. Looked at this way, I guess I’m for it; the more titles in print, the better. David Taylor sort of agrees with this part:

So sorry if I get a little greedy here, but if the only way to keep a title like Dragon Head running a little more towards completion is to have to buy it from the Tokyopop store then I’d certainly consider it. Notice consider it, not out right jump at the chance. Even I, don’t have enough love for a title to suddenly start paying double for the privilege.

But taking this one step further, Tokyopop could make the titles web-only at the beginning, which would build interest with less risk for the publisher (they’d still have translation and some production costs, but paper is expensive). Then if the titles caught on, they could do print editions. This seems to be working for Netcomics (which charges for the web manga) and Seven Seas (which doesn’t).

Lyle has another suggestion: Add Kindaichi Case Files to the list. Kindaichi is one of those titles that is much beloved but doesn’t sell particularly well, and releases have slowed to an ADV-like crawl. This title might get people started buying online exclusives, although maybe that’s why they included Dragon Head to begin with.

John Jakala points out that Tokyopop doesn’t seem to have any mechanism in place for letting retailers know that titles are going to be “online exclusives” in the future. That’s what Cathy at it can’t all be about manga, found out when she went to her local comics store. And apparently there’s some disconnect between Tokyopop and reality:

When I mentioned that Dragon Head would be one of the titles, BOTH of the store employees told me I had to be wrong, since that was a really popular title and sold well. MCSF also asked me to send her a list of the exclusive titles “since she couldn’t handle Tokyopop’s new website.”

At Postmodern Barney, Dorian has insights that don’t really match the conventional wisdom on the blogosphere:

Manga novels don’t sell. Sports manga don’t sell. So-called “global manga” titles don’t sell. A few Korean titles will sell every once in awhile, but the “original English language” stuff is almost always dead on arrival.

He also observes that retailers remember unfriendly gestures like this one, and this move may cause him to recommend dropping Tokyopop altogether.

I think it’s obvious at this point that Tokyopop needs to market this better, and having the publisher say it’s a great idea really isn’t enough. The online exclusives may indeed be a way to keep good manga in print even if the demand is low. If so, Tokyopop should act like they love it, have the editors blog about it, present it as the manga the cool kids are reading. Buzz is not random. If, on the other hand, it’s crap, they should mark it down, perhaps by giving coupons or buy-two-get-one-free deals if there’s a contractual requirement to sell the books at full price. But for god’s sake, market it!

In this same vein, I wonder if Tokyopop has given any thought to the issue of libraries, which aren’t likely to buy books online. If these are books that deserve to do well, sending free volume 1’s to libraries might be a way to kick-start the series. My kids often get a volume or two from the library and then buy the rest.

The online exclusives are not necessarily a terrible idea. My kids, who are probably more typical of manga consumers than we bloggers, are loyal to particular titles and will order them online if they can’t find them at the chains. And since they are usually spending my money, not theirs, they are not very price-conscious. They would totally go for this. But it needs to be marketed well, and so far Tokyopop hasn’t done enough in that direction.

Posted in Mangablog | 5 Comments

MangaBlogCast: Keeping the world safe for manga

The latest edition of MangaBlogCast is up for your listening pleasure.

Art theft confidential

The Tokyopop website
Mangaquake editors get a nasty surprise
Telophase explains why art theft hurts artists

Make mine manga

Graphic novels outsell pamphlet-style comics for the first time since last November.
ICv2 reports
Love Manga interprets
USA Today Booklist
The Grosse Adventures

Selling manga to the Japanese

Is Tokyopop exporting global manga to Japan?

Chris Arrant interviews Takeshi Miyazawa, who is heading to Japan to try his luck as a manga-ka.

And now, a word from our editors

Tokyopop editors try their hand at blogging.

Photo of Rob Tokar with a bag on his head
Lillian Diaz-Pryzbyl
CEO Stu Levy
Our fearless guide, ChunHyang72

Comiket week

MangaCast, home of the Comiket podcasts
Photos at Go!Comi blog
Wired on doujinshi
Simon Jones on why doujinshi won’t catch on here

Scanlation nation

Bandai to fansubbers: Drop dead
Dirk Deppey explains why the rest of us should care

CMX: Anybody home?

ICv2 interview with Paul Levitz (part three, where he talks about CMX)
MangaBlog notes an omission (actually, two)
The anonymous “Ask CMX” page

Real men read Shoujo Beat

ANN posters say boys can read girls’ books
Yaoi audience causes problems for Japanese SJ

Incoming…

From Del Rey:
ES, vol. 2
Negima, vol. 11
School Rumble, vol. 3
Suzuka, vol. 1

Others:
Iron Wok Jan, vol. 19
Anne Freaks, vol. 3
Kurosage Corpse Delivery Service, vol. 1

Posted in Mangablog | 4 Comments

Naruto: Hot!

The latest USA Today Booklist is up, and Naruto rises from 33 to 21 this week, nudging just a bit closer to that top ten and beating out Fruits Basket, which peaked at number 24. Speaking of Furuba, it’s hanging in for its fourth week on the chart but slips from 59 to 110. And what’s this? Volume 7 of Death Note at number 114. Apparently the manga-pimping is starting to pay off. Keep it up, Team Comix!

Posted in Mangablog | Comments Off on Naruto: Hot!

Talkin' Tokyopop

Well, Tokyopop was all over the web today (and, unlike Koge-Donbo, had its name spelled correctly each time).

The ICv2 interview with publisher Mike Kiley about online exclusives drew dismayed reactions from a number of bloggers, especially Dragon Head fans like David Welsh. Christopher Butcher was also not amused, and the title of Dave Lartigue’s blog post sums up his reaction: “Tokyopop to Dave: Please Stop Buying Our Comics.” Dave has already composed and sent a letter of protest, in which he observes that although he likes Dragon Head, he won’t order it online.

As much as I like the book, and I like it very much, at the end of the day it’s just a funnybook, and now that you’ve made it more of a hassle to order it, I won’t do so. I can live without it.

And this makes him hesitate to get involved with any more Tokyopop titles for fear that they too will become “online exclusives.”

John Jakala explains the price issue:

I can generally find manga for cheaper than cover price, but Tokyopop is charging full cover price for their “online exclusives” (with a note that these books are “Not Eligible For Additional Discounts” if you click the “Buy Now” link). And the shipping charges (the cheapest option is economy at $3 for the first item + $1 each additional item) are off-putting for someone who’s used to getting free shipping from other online sites.

At Sensei’s Ramblings, William Flanagan gives a much better explanation than Kiley of why this is happening, and as a bonus he tells us why the books aren’t likely to be discounted:

A 3rd-party retail outlet can put on any discount it wants as long as they pay the agreed-upon wholesale price to the distributor, but unless the publisher has worked a retail discount for itself into the original contract with the mangaka, the publisher is contractually bound to sell the book to the public at the cover price.

Oh. I suggest they start negotiating, because as Flanagan and Simon Jones both point out, by cutting out the middleman Tokyopop gets to keep the full cover price of each book it sells, as opposed to about $4 (Simon’s number) if it had to be split with Diamond and a comics store. If they cut the price to $7 or $8 the fans would be happy and Tokyopop would still come out ahead. At the very least, they should be looking at free shipping, before they scare everyone away.

Posted in Mangablog | 1 Comment

Tokyopop exclusives

It’s been over a month since Tokyopop revamped its website, and the changes have attracted plenty of attention online, so there’s an air of deja vu to ICv2’s article on the new site.

But here’s something new: a two-part interview with publisher Mike Kiley that focuses on the web exclusives, which have also attracted some comments on the blogosphere.

Part 1 purports to be about how books are chosen to be web exclusives, except that Kiley sort of shuffles his feet and claims that there is no “magic formula.”

We just want to take advantage of this new audience we have online, in acknowledgement of the competition for shelf space at retail. This is a way that made sense to us to try in terms of, ‘Can we help find a bigger audience for particular books using a slightly different platform?’

Then ICv2 just goes ahead and asks if books become web exclusives because they aren’t selling well, or aren’t expected to. Kiley talks around this but more or less admits it’s true for ongoing series:

Either A, they have been commercially very challenged and we want to try and give them a shot in a different way; or B, they’re just really special in some way that we think the regular distribution mechanism hasn’t been able to deal with. It hasn’t been able to get the right amount of exposure and highlighting that we think those titles deserve.

For the new titles, though, he says,

It’s very consciously more an attempt to say, ‘Here’s a book that we think is kind of quirky, interesting, can profit from a slightly different treatment prompted from the increased exposure it will get from this new audience that we’re cultivating online.’

One question that has occurred to me is whether retailers will resent having the business taken away from them. Kiley’s answer is basically, they wouldn’t have sold a lot of these anyway, which sort of speaks to the points previously made.

Part 2 talks more about the long-term plan. Kiley opens up the possibility that if a new series does well online, it may make the transition to retail stores, although he says that won’t happen with ongoing series, like Dragon Head, that are moved to online exclusives.

And then we get down to nuts and bolts. How does this program benefit Tokyopop? Kiley hems and haws but admits that the online exclusive program will result in lower sales but higher margins on these books.

But you also have to be willing — if you believe in something, if you believe something is worth trying to stick with it — to take your lumps for a while, if necessary, all in the spirit of building a new channel and building a new way of interacting with customers.

At Love Manga, David Taylor has some excellent post-interview commentary, which pretty much echoes my thoughts on the program. I wanted to emphasize one thing that Kiley didn’t even mention, though, and that’s price. One of the biggest complaints I have seen about this program is that people who buy their manga online are used to getting a discount, and Tokyopop sells these books at their usual price, $9.99. Presumably there is a shipping charge as well. So people who are used to buying online resent paying full price, and people who aren’t used to it have a higher resistance to begin with. Cutting the price even a dollar would make these books seem like a better deal. If they really wanted to gamble, they could offer volume 1’s at a really low price, say $5, to get people to give them a try, and then raise the price for subsequent volumes. Maybe $6 for volume 2, $7 for volume 3, and so on. What we’ve seen with strong series like Fruits Basket and Naruto is that the later volumes sell better, so if you have a good series, that strategy could work. But are the online exclusives strong series? If they are, why aren’t they in stores? And if they aren’t, why should I pay the full ten bucks?

Posted in Mangablog | 5 Comments